How Public Sector Changing it's Role in India ?

CHANGING ROLE OF PUBLIC SECTOR

At the time of Independence, it was expected that the public sector enterprises would play an important role in achieving certain objectives of the economy either by direct participation in business or by acting as a catalyst. 

The public sector would build up infrastructure for other sectors of the economy and invest in key areas. 

The private sector was unwilling to invest in projects which required heavy investment and had long gestation periods. 

The government then took it upon itself to develop infrastructural facilities and provide for goods and services essential for the economy.

The Indian economy is in a stage of transition. The Five Year Plans in the initial stages of development gave lot of importance to the public sector.

 In the post-1990s, the new economic policies, emphasised on liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation. Therole of public sector was redefined. 

It was not supposed to play a passive role but to actively participate and compete in the market with other private sector companies in the same industry. 

They were also held accountable for losses and return on investment. If a public sector was making losses continuously, it was referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) for complete overhauling or shut down. 

Various committees were set up to study the working of inefficient public sector units with reports on how to improve their managerial efficiency and profitability. 

The role of public sector is definitely not what was envisaged in the early 1960s or 70s.

(i) Development of infrastructure: 

The development of infrastructure is a prerequisite for industrialisation in any country. In the pre-Independence period, basic infrastructure was not developed and therefore, industrialisation progressedindustrial construction and train technicians and workforce. 

Rail, road, sea and air transport was the responsibility of the government, and their expansion has contributed to the pace of industrialisation and ensured future economic growth. The public sector enterprises were to operate in certain spheres. Investments were to be made to:

(a) Give infrastructure to the core sector, which requires huge capital investment, complex and upgraded technology, big and effective organisation structures like steel plants, power generation plants, civil aviation, railways, petroleum, state trading, coal, etc;

(b) Give a lead in investment to the core sector where private sector enterprises are not functioning in the desired direction, like fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, petro-chemicals, newsprint, medium and heavy engineering;

 (c) Give direction to future investments like hotels, project

management, consultancies,

textiles, auto-mobiles, etc.

(ii) Regional balance:

The government is responsible for developing all regions and states in a balanced way and removing regional disparties. Most of the industrial progress was limited to a few areas like the port towns in the pre-Independence period. After 1951, the government laid down in its Five Year Plans, that particular attention would be paid to those regions which were lagging behind and public sectorindustries were deliberately set up. Four major steel plants were set up in the backward areas to accelerate economic development, provide employment to the workforce and develop ancilliary industries. This was achieved to some extent but there is scope for a lot more. Development of backward regions so as to ensure a regional balance in the country is one of the major objectives of planned development. Therefore, the govern ment had to locate new enterprises in backward areas and at the same time prevent the mushrooming growth of private sector units in already advanced areas.

(iii) Economies of scale: 

Where large scale industries are required to be set up with huge capital outlay, the public sector had to step in to take advantage of economies of scale. Electric power plants, natural gas, petroleum and telephone industries are some examples of the public sector setting up large scale units. These units required a larger base to function economically which was only possible with government resources and mass scale production.

(iv) Check over concentration of economic power: 

The public sector acts as a check over the private sector. In the private sector there are very few industrial housesThe public sector is able to set large industries which requires heavy investment and thus the income and benefits that accrue are shared by a large of number of employees and workers. This prevents concentration of wealth and economic power in the private sector.

(v) Import substitution: 

During the second and third Five Year Plan period, India was aiming to be self-reliant in many spheres. Obtaining foreign exchange was also a problem and it was difficult to import heavy machinery required for a strong industrial base. At that time, public sector companies involved in heavy engineering which would help in import substitution were established. Simultaneously, several public sector companies like STC and MMTC have played an important role in expanding exports of the country.

(vi) Government policy towards the public sector since 1991:

The Government of India had introduced four major reforms in the public sector in its new industrial policy in 1991. The main elements of the Government policy are as follows:

• Restructure and revive potentially viable PSUS

• Close down PSUS, which cannot be revived

Bring down governments equity in all non-strategic PSUS to 26 per cent or lower, if necessary; and Fully protect the interest of